THE REFLECTION OF TRANSITIONAL SOCIETY OF MYTILENE AT THE END OF THE ARCHAIC PERIOD (8TH – 5TH CENTURY B.C.) A STUDY ON SAPPHO’S “ODE TO ANAKTORIA”

Lydia Kanelli Kyvelou Kokkaliari, Bani Sudardi

Abstract


This article discusses Sappho’s “Ode to Anaktoria” (fragment 16) poem as a ‘marginal’ product of an aristocratic intellectual in the transitional society of Mytilene at the end of the Archaic Period (8th-5th century B.C.). The research method is a kind of media analysis. The mean of “media” in this paper related to “A means by which something is communicated or expressed” It is laso relate to the intervening substance through which sensory impressions are conveyed or physical forces are transmitted. Media also means as a substance in which an organism lives or is cultured. On the other hand, media is a material or form used by an artist, composer, or writer; We interpreted Ode to Anaktoria  in the means as the terms of media above. Sappho (born 610, died 570 B.C.) is a renowned Greek lyric poetess and musician and is greatly admired in all ages for the beauty of her writing style. Plato’s 16th epigram dedicated to her reads “Some say there are nine Muses; but they should stop to think. Look at Sappho of Lesbos; she makes a tenth”. Sappho is additionally ranked among the Nine Lyric Poets esteemed by the scholars of Hellenistic Alexandria as worthy of critical study. “Ode to Anaktoria” is read through the historic-political concept of hegemony as suggested by Gramsci. In this view, the moment of “hegemony” or of cultural leadership is systematically upgraded precisely in opposition to the mechanistic and fatalistic concepts of economism. Sappho’s fragment 16 does not only indicate defiance to androcentric (epic) categories; she suggests nonnormative, thus new, ways of contemplating life (lyric).


Keywords


Sappho; Ode to Anaktoria; Lyric Poetry; Hegemony; Archaic Greece

Full Text:

PDF

References


Adorno, Theodor W. 1991. Notes on Literature. Volume One. TR. Shierry Weber Nicholsen. New York: Columbia University Press.

Alcoff, Linda. 1988. “Cultural Feminism versus Poststructuralism: The Identity Crisis in Feminist Theory.” Signs 13.3.

Bates, Thomas R. 1975. “Gramsci and the Theory of Hegemony.” Journal of the History of Ideas, Vol. 36, No. 2 University of Pennsylvania Press.

Bhabha, Homi. 1984. “Of Mimicry and Man: The Ambivalence of Colonial Discourse. “October Vol. 28, Discipleship: A Special Issue on Psychoanalysis.

Bremner, Jan, editor. 1989. From Sappho to de Sade: Moments in the history of sexuality. London: Routledge.

De Lauretis, Teresa. 1984. Alice Doesn’t. Indiana: Indiana University Press Bloomington.

Derrida, Jacques. 2004. Différance. in Rivkin Julie Ryan Michael. Literary Theory: An Anthology. Blackwell.

Foley, Helene P. editor. 1981. Reflections of Women in Antiquity. New York: Gordon and Breach.

Green, Ellen, editor. 1996. Reading Sappho: Contemporary Approaches. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Key Ideas, Simulation and the Hyperreal, pp 83-101

Kiralyfalvi, Bela. 1981. “Lukacs’s View on Artistic Freedom.” British Journal of Aesthetics.

Lardinois André. 1994. “Subject and Circumstance in Sappho’s Poetry.” Transactions of the American Philological Association Vol. 124.

Lefkowitz, Mary R. 1974. Critical Stereotypes and the Poetry of Sappho. Greek, Roman, and Byzantine Studies 14.

Levi-Strauss, Claude. 1963. TR. Jacobson, Claire & GrundfestSchoepf, Brooke. Structural Anthropology, New York: Basic Books.

Lukacs, George. History and Class Consiousness, Reification and the Consciousness of the Proletariat, 1923 in George Lukacs Internet Archive, https://www.marxists.org/archive/lukacs/works/history/hcc07_1.htm#2 (retrieved: 05 Nov 2016)

Nagy, Gregor. 1973. Phaethon, Sappho’s Phaon, and the White Rock of Lefkas. Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 77.

Oxford Dictionaries, https://en.oxforddictionaries.com

Stoddart, Mark C. J. Ideology, Hegemony, Discourse: A Critical Review of Theories of Knowledge and Power. Social Thought & Research, 2007. University of British Columbia, p.p.191-225, https://kuscholarworks. ku.edu/bitstream/handle/1808/5226/STARV28A9.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=yhttps://kuscholarworks.ku.edu/bitstream/handle/1808/5226/STARV28A9.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y (retrieved: 17 October 2016)

Zhmud, Leonid J. 1995. “On the Concept of “Mythical Thinking”.” Hyperboreus Vol. 1, Petropoli.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.18784/analisa.v2i01.414
Abstract - 81 PDF - 81

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Copyright (c) 2017 Analisa



Creative Commons License
Analisa: Journal of Social and Religion is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

 hit counter joomla View My Stats